​A Critical Step Toward Exposing the Corruption in the Medical Board System and Regaining the Right to Practice

Click to visit Dr. Paul's Fight

Hello to all health freedom friends and family,
In February 2025, the National Health Federation (NHF) filed an amicus brief supporting my petition before the U.S. Supreme Court. This brief highlights the injustice I’ve faced and the need for the Court to examine the actions of medical boards that punish those who challenge the vaccine narrative. After publishing research on the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children, I found myself targeted by the Oregon Medical Board, which revoked my medical license. The brief underscores the role of pharmaceutical interests in pushing medical boards to silence doctors who speak out.
​"Petitioner Dr. Paul Thomas is credible, likeable, published, and has over 500,000,000 views on his YouTube channel where he questions vaccines and features non-pharma options for families. His influence is the most likely reason his license was targeted by Respondents."
– National Health Federation Amicus Brief
Here are the key takeaways from the brief:
  • My Influence: With over 500 million views on my YouTube channel, I’ve built trust with families seeking non-pharmaceutical options for their children. My research on vaccines has helped many families make informed choices about their children's health.
  • The Role of Medical Boards: The brief calls attention to how state medical boards, target doctors like me who publish research showing the superior health outcomes of unvaccinated children, all while aligning with pharmaceutical interests.
  • Corruption and Censorship: The NHF argues that the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) is complicit in censoring those who challenge the mainstream narrative, particularly in regard to vaccines, by using their influence to revoke licenses and suppress research.
  • The Need for Justice: The brief emphasizes that my case is not just about me—it's about exposing the corruption in the medical licensing system and ensuring doctors can practice freely without fear of retaliation for their research and views.

​Why This Matters to You

This case is crucial not only for my ability to practice medicine but for the future of medical freedom and informed consent. The NHF’s brief brings to light how my case is emblematic of a larger problem where those who challenge the pharmaceutical agenda are silenced and persecuted. It’s about standing up for our right to provide accurate, unbiased information to families and to allow them to make informed decisions about their children’s health. The U.S. Supreme Court must address this systemic issue to protect our freedoms.

​Join Us in the Fight

I need your support now more than ever. This is a fight not just for my ability to continue my research and practice, but for the right of all doctors to speak openly and honestly about health matters, without fear of retaliation. Together, we can expose the corruption within the system and restore balance to medical practice.
​Read the full amicus brief below:
Share with your Friends & Family
​Join us in supporting Dr. Paul’s fight for medical freedom and a chance to expose corruption in the medical board system. Share this post, spread the word, and stay tuned for more updates.
#SupportDrPaul #MedicalFreedom #InformedConsent #VaccinationDebate #ExposeTheCorruption @thenhf @paulthomasmd