When Truth Isn’t Heard in Court, We Speak Louder: The Fight for Medical Freedom Continues

​We were among the 99% of cases the Supreme Court chooses not to hear—but that won’t stop us from speaking louder for informed consent.

This morning, we received the news that the Supreme Court has decided not to hear our case.

Officially, the petition for writ of certiorari was denied.

For those who have followed this fight from the beginning, you know this case wasn't just about me, Dr. Paul. It was about all of us — about the right of parents to choose, about doctors being able to speak openly with patients, and about protecting the sacred principle of informed consent.

As DeeDee so honestly shared:

“We kept going up all these steps thinking that somebody would hear the truth... that what this man went through... what it means to all the families out there... somebody at a high level would say, 'Hey, that's wrong.'"

While we didn’t get our day in the highest court, this is not the end of our mission. It is simply another step in a journey we have always known would require resilience, faith, and the support of a community that believes in truth.

Our case, at its core, challenged the actions of the Oregon Medical Board. After we published the now-famous "Vaxxed-Unvaxxed" study showing that unvaccinated children were healthier by many measures, I was stripped of my license and silenced from sharing real-world data from my own practice. This was a direct assault on both scientific freedom and the sacred doctor-patient relationship.

"As a doctor, I was not allowed to share what I knew... Namely, if you don't vaccinate, your children will be so much healthier."
— Dr. Paul

And while the petition wasn’t granted review, we were not alone in this fight. Four powerful amicus briefs were submitted in support—by the National Health Federation (NHF), Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), and experts James Lyons-Weiler and Dr. Russell Blaylock.

Their words spoke volumes:

“Vaccines are dangerous. Institutions are complicit in concealing the danger, and enriching the perpetrators. Dr. Thomas should be afforded the opportunity to expose in court the corruption, and in the process regain his license necessary to the proper functioning of his data collection and scientific publication.”
​— NHF Amicus Brief

“If the Ninth Circuit’s decision is permitted to stand... it will function as a blanket pardon for any wrongdoing by any medical board employee or staff member.”
​— ICAN Amicus Brief

“Absolute immunity is inappropriate for state officials who make licensure decisions... it becomes unsafe for any professional or licensee to speak out on controversial issues.”
​— AAPS Amicus Brief

We know why the case mattered. The truth was laid out. But the Supreme Court can only accept about 1% of the cases it's asked to hear. We were among the 99% that don’t make it through that narrow gate.

Still, the truth remains. And the movement continues.

We will not let this setback silence the growing awareness around medical freedom, informed refusal, and the corruption within captured institutions. Instead, we ask you to stand with us, speak louder, and help share what mainstream channels continue to suppress.

We invite you to:

• Learn more and support our ongoing legal and advocacy efforts at www.DrPaulsFight.com
• Read and share our new book, VAX FACTS — a must-read for anyone navigating vaccine decisions
• Explore more about our work at Kids First 4Ever
• Stay informed at PaulThomasMD.com

We are not backing down. In fact, we are just getting started.
​One family, one doctor, one voice at a time.

---

#DrPaulsFight #InformedConsent #MedicalFreedom #VaxFacts #KidsFirst4Ever #TruthOverCensorship #HealthFreedom #ICAN #NHF #AAPS #FreeSpeechInMedicine #StandWithDrPaul