• Published on

    Join Kids First 4Ever in Supporting the Autism Health Summit!

    Empowering Families with Groundbreaking Autism Insights and Solutions

    We're proud to support the Autism Health Summit, taking place April 11-13, 2025, at the Town & Country Resort in San Diego, CA. This transformative event brings together leading experts, dedicated advocates, and committed families to explore innovative research and practical solutions for autism and other neurological conditions.
    While we won't be attending the event in person, we strongly believe in its mission to equip parents with the knowledge they need to make informed decisions about their family's health.
    As valued members of the Kids First 4Ever community, please enjoy an exclusive discount: use promo code AHS50 at checkout for $50 off your ticket.
    Join the conversation and help shape a healthier future for our children. Register today and become part of this vital movement!
    Register Here
    Warmly,
    DeeDee Hoover (Just a Mom - JAM) and Dr. Paul (retired)
  • Published on

    Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) Amicus Brief: Supporting Dr. Paul Thomas and Medical Freedom

    ​Defending Free Speech and the Right to Informed Consent Against Medical Board Overreach

    Dr. Paul Thomas, ICAN amicus brief, informed consent, medical freedom, free speech in medicine
    Hello to all health freedom friends and family,

    I am honored to share that the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) has filed an amicus brief in support of my case before the U.S. Supreme Court. ICAN has been at the forefront of advocating for transparency in medical decision-making, the right to informed consent, and ensuring that Americans have access to scientifically sound health information. Their brief is a powerful defense of medical freedom, exposing how state medical boards are being weaponized against doctors who simply provide patients with full and honest medical information​.

    A Powerful Message from the Brief

    "The Ninth Circuit’s decision calls out for this Court’s review for a myriad of reasons... More crucial, however, is the need for this Court to correct what will inevitably flow from this decision, which is the stifling of physicians’ speech and, with it, patients’ inability to give truly informed consent."
    — ICAN Amicus Brief​
    This quote speaks to the heart of what is at stake—not just for me, but for every doctor who dares to uphold the fundamental principles of informed consent and free speech in medicine.

    Document Summary: What ICAN’s Brief Argues

    The ICAN amicus brief presents a clear and compelling case for why my fight matters—not just for me, but for the entire medical community and for every patient’s right to informed medical choices. Here are the main takeaways:
    • Defending Free Speech for Physicians – The brief argues that doctors should never face punishment simply for providing their patients with full, science-based information on medical procedures, including vaccines. Censoring medical professionals undermines trust in the doctor-patient relationship and erodes the right of individuals to make informed health decisions​.
    • The Oregon Medical Board’s Overreach – ICAN details how the Oregon Medical Board (OMB) revoked my medical license not because of any malpractice or harm, but simply because I offered parents a choice in how they approached vaccines. The brief argues that this is a clear violation of free speech protections and an attempt to silence any dissenting medical opinions.
    • Informed Consent is Non-Negotiable – The ICAN brief makes it clear: Informed consent requires that patients receive all relevant medical information, including risks and benefits, without coercion. The OMB’s actions violate this principle by attempting to dictate what doctors can and cannot say about medical interventions​.
    • The Need for Supreme Court Intervention – If this precedent is allowed to stand, any doctor who challenges the pharmaceutical-driven narrative could face career-ending retaliation. The brief urges the U.S. Supreme Court to take up this case and ensure that medical boards cannot silence physicians simply for presenting science that challenges the status quo.

    ​​Why This Matters to You 

    This case is about more than just my ability to practice medicine—it’s about protecting the integrity of all medical professionals and ensuring that you, as patients, have access to truthful, comprehensive medical information. If doctors are afraid to speak out, patients lose their ability to make truly informed choices. No medical board should have the power to dictate what doctors can and cannot say when it comes to patient care
    The ICAN brief makes it clear: This case is about stopping government overreach before it becomes the norm. We cannot allow unelected bureaucrats to silence science, control the doctor-patient relationship, and strip away our fundamental rights to free speech and informed medical decision-making.

    Join Us in the Fight

    This battle isn’t just mine—it’s ours. The support I have received from ICAN and many other organizations is a testament to the growing movement to protect medical freedom. But we need your help to keep the momentum going.

    ​Read the full amicus brief below:

    ​Join us in supporting Dr. Paul’s fight for medical freedom and a chance to expose corruption in the medical board system. Share this post, spread the word, and stay tuned for more updates.
    #SupportDrPaul #MedicalFreedom #InformedConsent #DoctorFreeSpeech #ExposeTheCorruption @ICANdecide @paulthomasmd
  • Published on

    The Big Picture; Life Inside The Control Grid: A Must-Watch Film for Truth Seekers

    Discover the Hidden Agenda and How You Can Fight Back​

    The Big Picture: Life Inside the Control Grid

    As advocates for truth and medical freedom, we recognize that the world is awakening to the reality that not everything is as it seems. Systems in healthcare, media, and government often operate under agendas that may not prioritize individual well-being.
    We encourage everyone to join us on Friday, February 28, 2025, for the premiere of “The Big Picture: Life Inside The Control Grid”—a groundbreaking film that aims to clarify the chaos we are experiencing today and offer effective ways to resist overarching control agendas.

    ​A Film That Exposes the Truth

    Directed by Todd Michael Harris, this compelling documentary features prominent voices such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Catherine Austin Fitts, Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Pierre Kory, and Dr. Paul Thomas. Together, they delve into mechanisms that have been used to influence public perception and restrict freedoms.
    The film addresses topics including pharmaceutical monopolies, the integrity of our food supply, media influence on public opinion, and the corporatization of medicine, revealing a control grid established over the past century.
    “The Big Picture: Life Inside The Control Grid”
    Friday, February 28, 2025 at 10 a.m. and 6 p.m. ET
    Premiere on CHD TV

    Why This Matters Now More Than Ever

    Recent years have unveiled significant instances of corporate and governmental collaboration affecting various aspects of our lives. Events like the COVID-19 pandemic have highlighted potential future measures that could further limit personal autonomy, especially concerning medical decisions.
    This film offers an investigative look into these control systems, exposing a network of influence that extends beyond recent events.​
    ​"Today is a new day. We don't need to despair. There is always hope for a better tomorrow."
    — Dr. Paul Thomas 

    Watch and Share

    We invite you to watch this impactful film with us and help disseminate its message. The more individuals who become aware, the stronger our collective ability to advocate for freedom becomes.
    For more information, tune into a special edition of CHD TV’s “Doctors & Scientists”, where host Brian Hooker interviews those involved in the film's creation. You can also watch the trailer now on Vimeo.

    Stay informed, stay empowered, and most importantly—stay free.

    #TheBigPicture #CHDTV #MedicalFreedom #TruthUnveiled #HealthFreedom #ResistTheAgenda
  • Published on

    AAPS Amicus Brief Supports Dr. Paul Thomas: Defending Medical Freedom and Free Speech

    The Fight to Protect Doctors' Rights to Speak Openly About Vaccines and Informed Consent

    Hello to all health freedom friends and family,
    ​I’m excited to share that the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) has filed an amicus brief in support of my case before the U.S. Supreme Court. This brief emphasizes the importance of protecting our First Amendment rights as physicians, especially when it comes to speaking openly about vaccines and other health matters that may not align with the mainstream narrative.
    The AAPS has a long history of advocating for the preservation of the patient-physician relationship and standing up against governmental overreach. In this brief, they make a compelling case for why state medical boards like the Oregon Medical Board should not be granted absolute immunity when retaliating against doctors who simply express their professional opinions on controversial topics, such as vaccines.
    "Without accountability for retaliatory actions by government, it becomes unsafe for any professional or licensee to speak out on controversial issues such as transgender operations or abortion." – AAPS Amicus Brief
    This powerful statement from the AAPS brief underscores a fundamental principle of justice: protecting the rights of professionals to speak freely without fear of retaliation. In my case, it's not just about my right to speak on vaccine safety—it’s about ensuring that all professionals have the freedom to share their research and opinions, no matter how controversial they may be.
    Here are a few key points from the AAPS amicus brief:
    • First Amendment Rights: The brief argues that government officials, including medical board members, should not be allowed to infringe on a doctor’s right to free speech. My research and views on vaccines are just that—views backed by science and my personal experience—but the Oregon Medical Board tried to silence me, and this brief is asking the Court to protect my right to speak freely without fear of retaliation.
    • Qualified Immunity vs. Absolute Immunity: The AAPS highlights the dangerous precedent of granting absolute immunity to medical boards. This type of immunity could allow state agencies to take retaliatory actions against physicians like me, without any accountability, simply because we hold differing views on public health issues. The brief argues for qualified immunity instead, which offers protection for government officials while still allowing for accountability when their actions infringe on constitutional rights.
    • The Need for Court Intervention: Just like the National Health Federation’s brief, the AAPS amicus brief underscores the need for the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene and address the power imbalance that allows these medical boards to suppress alternative viewpoints and force conformity to pharmaceutical interests. The brief makes it clear that this is not just about my case—it’s about ensuring that doctors everywhere can speak freely about medical practices, without risking their careers.
    This brief is a significant step forward in the fight for health freedom and the right to informed consent. I’m grateful to the AAPS for their unwavering support, and I’m hopeful that the U.S. Supreme Court will recognize the importance of this issue.
    Read the full amicus brief below:

    Join us in supporting Dr. Paul’s fight for medical freedom and a chance to expose corruption in the medical board system.
    ​Share this post, spread the word, and stay tuned for more updates.

    Share with your Friends & Family
    Yours in good health,
    Picture

    Dr. Paul

    #SupportDrPaul #MedicalFreedom #HealthFreedom #FirstAmendment #InformedConsent @aaps_online @paulthomasmd
  • Published on

    Pharma Exposed: The Truth Is Hard to Suppress Forever

    How the Medical Establishment Silences Dissent and What You Need to Know

    It was Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s seminal 1998 article (discussed in JB Handley’s Substack) that planted the first seed of awareness for me. I recall thinking, Hmmm ... could vaccines be related to autism? That little thought reached—one that I imagine many parents have had— started my journey of inquiry. It took me almost a decade to reach the point of knowing, without a doubt, that toxins and vaccines (environmental factors) were either the direct cause or highly involved in the epidemic of chronic diseases in children, including autism.
    Today, we have many studies that make it abundantly clear that our children are suffering due to what is being done to them—through vaccines, toxic food, fluoride in water, and more. Parents, if you are new to this journey of discovery, pause on the vaccines while you make it your mission to learn enough to make an informed decision.

    ​The Truth About Vaccine Safety

    The books mentioned in JB Handley’s article are essential reads, but I also encourage you to explore my latest book, Vax Facts: What to Consider Before Vaccinating at All Ages & Stages of Life, co-authored with DeeDee Hoover (Just a Mom) and published in 2025.
    In Vax Facts, I hold nothing back because I have nothing to lose now. I was forced to relinquish my medical license for publishing a pivotal vaxxed/unvaxxed study that demonstrated vaccinated children experience chronic diseases and infections at 300–800% greater severity than their unvaccinated counterparts. It was my first book, The Vaccine-Friendly Plan, that threatened the CDC’s "Vaccine Schedule" and triggered my persecution by the Oregon Medical Board.

    Vaxxed/Unvaxxed Study

    Visit Vaxx/Unvaxxed site

    Rejecting Junk Science

    ​It is time we expose the truth. The flawed “tobacco science” that has kept parents in the dark about the dangers of vaccines needs to be rejected. Since no proper long-term studies exist on vaccine safety, we must assume they are all unsafe until proven otherwise. That is not an “anti-vaccine” or “anti-science” stance—it is simply applying the basic principles of scientific rigor.
    I support RFK Jr. in calling for real scientific studies. Let’s get the data. The CDC, NIH, and every major medical institution are sitting on vast amounts of data. The solution is simple—just pull the data for all unvaccinated children, age-match them to vaccinated children, and examine all health outcomes. Then, report what you find.

    Read This Powerful Blog Post by JB Handley

    The fight for medical freedom continues, and one of the most important stories to understand is that of Dr. Andrew Wakefield. If you haven’t already, take the time to read JB Handley’s latest blog post. This article provides a deep dive into Wakefield’s research, the smear campaign against him, and the broader implications for vaccine safety and informed consent.

    Visit the blog post

    ​This is one of the most informative pieces you’ll read on this topic—share it with others who need to hear the truth!

    ​A Call to Action

    Click for more information

    ​Parents, you have the right to true informed consent. If you’re still in the process of making your decision, arm yourself with knowledge. Visit Kids First 4Ever to find resources and coaching with DeeDee and me. If you're looking for an in-depth, science-backed guide, get your copy of Vax Facts today.
    The truth is coming out. It’s time to stop the suppression and take back control of our children’s health.
    Yours in good health,
    Picture

    Dr. Paul (retired)

  • Published on

    Dr. Paul Thomas' Case at the U.S. Supreme Court: National Health Federation's Amicus Brief in Support

    ​A Critical Step Toward Exposing the Corruption in the Medical Board System and Regaining the Right to Practice

    Click to visit Dr. Paul's Fight

    Hello to all health freedom friends and family,
    In February 2025, the National Health Federation (NHF) filed an amicus brief supporting my petition before the U.S. Supreme Court. This brief highlights the injustice I’ve faced and the need for the Court to examine the actions of medical boards that punish those who challenge the vaccine narrative. After publishing research on the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children, I found myself targeted by the Oregon Medical Board, which revoked my medical license. The brief underscores the role of pharmaceutical interests in pushing medical boards to silence doctors who speak out.
    ​"Petitioner Dr. Paul Thomas is credible, likeable, published, and has over 500,000,000 views on his YouTube channel where he questions vaccines and features non-pharma options for families. His influence is the most likely reason his license was targeted by Respondents."
    – National Health Federation Amicus Brief
    Here are the key takeaways from the brief:
    • My Influence: With over 500 million views on my YouTube channel, I’ve built trust with families seeking non-pharmaceutical options for their children. My research on vaccines has helped many families make informed choices about their children's health.
    • The Role of Medical Boards: The brief calls attention to how state medical boards, target doctors like me who publish research showing the superior health outcomes of unvaccinated children, all while aligning with pharmaceutical interests.
    • Corruption and Censorship: The NHF argues that the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) is complicit in censoring those who challenge the mainstream narrative, particularly in regard to vaccines, by using their influence to revoke licenses and suppress research.
    • The Need for Justice: The brief emphasizes that my case is not just about me—it's about exposing the corruption in the medical licensing system and ensuring doctors can practice freely without fear of retaliation for their research and views.

    ​Why This Matters to You

    This case is crucial not only for my ability to practice medicine but for the future of medical freedom and informed consent. The NHF’s brief brings to light how my case is emblematic of a larger problem where those who challenge the pharmaceutical agenda are silenced and persecuted. It’s about standing up for our right to provide accurate, unbiased information to families and to allow them to make informed decisions about their children’s health. The U.S. Supreme Court must address this systemic issue to protect our freedoms.

    ​Join Us in the Fight

    I need your support now more than ever. This is a fight not just for my ability to continue my research and practice, but for the right of all doctors to speak openly and honestly about health matters, without fear of retaliation. Together, we can expose the corruption within the system and restore balance to medical practice.
    ​Read the full amicus brief below:
    Share with your Friends & Family
    ​Join us in supporting Dr. Paul’s fight for medical freedom and a chance to expose corruption in the medical board system. Share this post, spread the word, and stay tuned for more updates.
    #SupportDrPaul #MedicalFreedom #InformedConsent #VaccinationDebate #ExposeTheCorruption @thenhf @paulthomasmd