Tags

  • Published on

    Dr. Paul Thomas Joins Mondays with Michael Podcast

    kids-first-4-ever-blog-mdash-child-health-amp-parenting-news

    ​Don’t Miss This Conversation on Truth, Health, and Freedom

    Dr. Paul Thomas will be joining the Mondays with Michael podcast today, March 31st, at 10:00 a.m. PST / 1:00 p.m. EST for a live conversation. Tune in to hear Dr. Paul bring his passion for truth, transparency, and informed health decisions to this engaging episode. Catch it live at https://michaelgaeta.com/mwm.
    #DrPaulThomas #MondaysWithMichael #HealthFreedom #InformedConsent #NaturalHealth #LivePodcast #MedicalFreedom #TruthMatters #PodcastInterview #MichaelGaeta
    @drpaulapproved @michaelgaetaofficial
  • Published on

    When Truth Isn’t Heard in Court, We Speak Louder: The Fight for Medical Freedom Continues

    kids-first-4-ever-blog-mdash-child-health-amp-parenting-news

    ​We were among the 99% of cases the Supreme Court chooses not to hear—but that won’t stop us from speaking louder for informed consent.

    This morning, we received the news that the Supreme Court has decided not to hear our case.
    Officially, the petition for writ of certiorari was denied.
    For those who have followed this fight from the beginning, you know this case wasn't just about me, Dr. Paul. It was about all of us — about the right of parents to choose, about doctors being able to speak openly with patients, and about protecting the sacred principle of informed consent.
    As DeeDee so honestly shared:
    “We kept going up all these steps thinking that somebody would hear the truth... that what this man went through... what it means to all the families out there... somebody at a high level would say, 'Hey, that's wrong.'"
    While we didn’t get our day in the highest court, this is not the end of our mission. It is simply another step in a journey we have always known would require resilience, faith, and the support of a community that believes in truth.
    Our case, at its core, challenged the actions of the Oregon Medical Board. After we published the now-famous "Vaxxed-Unvaxxed" study showing that unvaccinated children were healthier by many measures, I was stripped of my license and silenced from sharing real-world data from my own practice. This was a direct assault on both scientific freedom and the sacred doctor-patient relationship.
    "As a doctor, I was not allowed to share what I knew... Namely, if you don't vaccinate, your children will be so much healthier."
    — Dr. Paul
    And while the petition wasn’t granted review, we were not alone in this fight. Four powerful amicus briefs were submitted in support—by the National Health Federation (NHF), Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), and experts James Lyons-Weiler and Dr. Russell Blaylock.
    Their words spoke volumes:
    “Vaccines are dangerous. Institutions are complicit in concealing the danger, and enriching the perpetrators. Dr. Thomas should be afforded the opportunity to expose in court the corruption, and in the process regain his license necessary to the proper functioning of his data collection and scientific publication.”
    ​— NHF Amicus Brief
    “If the Ninth Circuit’s decision is permitted to stand... it will function as a blanket pardon for any wrongdoing by any medical board employee or staff member.”
    ​— ICAN Amicus Brief
    “Absolute immunity is inappropriate for state officials who make licensure decisions... it becomes unsafe for any professional or licensee to speak out on controversial issues.”
    ​— AAPS Amicus Brief
    We know why the case mattered. The truth was laid out. But the Supreme Court can only accept about 1% of the cases it's asked to hear. We were among the 99% that don’t make it through that narrow gate.
    Still, the truth remains. And the movement continues.
    We will not let this setback silence the growing awareness around medical freedom, informed refusal, and the corruption within captured institutions. Instead, we ask you to stand with us, speak louder, and help share what mainstream channels continue to suppress.
    We invite you to:

    We are not backing down. In fact, we are just getting started.
    ​One family, one doctor, one voice at a time.

    #DrPaulsFight #InformedConsent #MedicalFreedom #VaxFacts #KidsFirst4Ever #TruthOverCensorship #HealthFreedom #ICAN #NHF #AAPS #FreeSpeechInMedicine #StandWithDrPaul
  • Published on

    Call for Prayer: March 21st – A Critical Moment for Medical Freedom

    kids-first-4-ever-blog-mdash-child-health-amp-parenting-news

    Dr. Paul Thomas’ legal action against the Oregon Medical Board reaches a pivotal moment as the U.S. Supreme Court will consider his petition for a writ of certiorari at its conference on March 21, 2025.

    ​For years, Dr. Paul has fought tirelessly for informed consent, the right of patients and parents to receive full and transparent medical information. In return, the Oregon Medical Board stripped him of his license, silencing his ability to practice and preventing him from continuing his groundbreaking research. Now, his case is before the highest court in the land, and we ask for your prayers and support at this critical juncture.

    ​The Journey to the Supreme Court

    This petition follows an extensive legal battle and the support of multiple amicus briefs filed on Dr. Paul’s behalf, reinforcing the fundamental rights at stake:
    • The Right to Discovery – To expose the actions of medical boards that target doctors for speaking out.
    • The Right to Free Speech – To protect doctors from being silenced when presenting science-based, patient-centered alternatives.
    • The Right to Medical Freedom – To ensure that informed consent remains a protected principle in healthcare.
    ​These briefs—filed by organizations such as the National Health Federation (NHF), the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), and the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)—highlight the grave consequences of suppressing medical truth and advocate for Dr. Paul’s right to a fair trial. They argue that his license was unjustly revoked, not based on patient complaints or harm, but because of his stance on medical freedom and informed choice

    Why March 21st Matters

    On March 21, 2025, the nine Supreme Court justices will meet to decide whether to hear Dr. Paul’s case. If granted, this would be a historic moment—not just for Dr. Paul, but for every physician and patient who values the right to informed medical decisions.

    Join Us in Prayer

    Dr. Paul has always believed in the power of faith, truth, and community. He is calling on everyone who supports medical freedom to pray on March 21st—that justice is served, that the truth is heard, and that the Supreme Court takes this case.
    "I am deeply grateful for the incredible support and unwavering faith from all of you who stand with me in this fight for informed consent and medical freedom. As our petition reaches the Supreme Court, I ask for your prayers—prayers for justice, prayers for truth, and prayers that doctors everywhere may regain their right to speak openly and honestly with their patients. Together, we stand for our children, our families, and the future of ethical medicine."
    — Dr. Paul
    For more details, visit the Supreme Court’s docket for Dr. Paul’s case here:
    https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/DocketFiles/html/Public/24-752.html
    Want to support Dr. Paul financially or through continued prayer? Visit his official site here:  https://doctorpaulsfight.com/index.html
    ​Thank you for standing with Dr. Paul in this fight. Your prayers and support make all the difference!
    #MedicalFreedom #InformedConsent #PrayForDrPaul #JusticeForDrPaul #SupremeCourt #March21 #FightForTruth
  • Published on

    Join Kids First 4Ever in Supporting the Autism Health Summit!

    kids-first-4-ever-blog-mdash-child-health-amp-parenting-news

    Empowering Families with Groundbreaking Autism Insights and Solutions

    We're proud to support the Autism Health Summit, taking place April 11-13, 2025, at the Town & Country Resort in San Diego, CA. This transformative event brings together leading experts, dedicated advocates, and committed families to explore innovative research and practical solutions for autism and other neurological conditions.
    While we won't be attending the event in person, we strongly believe in its mission to equip parents with the knowledge they need to make informed decisions about their family's health.
    As valued members of the Kids First 4Ever community, please enjoy an exclusive discount: use promo code AHS50 at checkout for $50 off your ticket.
    Join the conversation and help shape a healthier future for our children. Register today and become part of this vital movement!
    Register Here
    Warmly,
    DeeDee Hoover (Just a Mom - JAM) and Dr. Paul (retired)
  • Published on

    Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) Amicus Brief: Supporting Dr. Paul Thomas and Medical Freedom

    kids-first-4-ever-blog-mdash-child-health-amp-parenting-news

    ​Defending Free Speech and the Right to Informed Consent Against Medical Board Overreach

    Dr. Paul Thomas, ICAN amicus brief, informed consent, medical freedom, free speech in medicine
    Hello to all health freedom friends and family,

    I am honored to share that the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) has filed an amicus brief in support of my case before the U.S. Supreme Court. ICAN has been at the forefront of advocating for transparency in medical decision-making, the right to informed consent, and ensuring that Americans have access to scientifically sound health information. Their brief is a powerful defense of medical freedom, exposing how state medical boards are being weaponized against doctors who simply provide patients with full and honest medical information​.

    A Powerful Message from the Brief

    "The Ninth Circuit’s decision calls out for this Court’s review for a myriad of reasons... More crucial, however, is the need for this Court to correct what will inevitably flow from this decision, which is the stifling of physicians’ speech and, with it, patients’ inability to give truly informed consent."
    ​— ICAN Amicus Brief​
    This quote speaks to the heart of what is at stake—not just for me, but for every doctor who dares to uphold the fundamental principles of informed consent and free speech in medicine.

    Document Summary: What ICAN’s Brief Argues

    The ICAN amicus brief presents a clear and compelling case for why my fight matters—not just for me, but for the entire medical community and for every patient’s right to informed medical choices. Here are the main takeaways:
    • Defending Free Speech for Physicians – The brief argues that doctors should never face punishment simply for providing their patients with full, science-based information on medical procedures, including vaccines. Censoring medical professionals undermines trust in the doctor-patient relationship and erodes the right of individuals to make informed health decisions​.
    • The Oregon Medical Board’s Overreach – ICAN details how the Oregon Medical Board (OMB) revoked my medical license not because of any malpractice or harm, but simply because I offered parents a choice in how they approached vaccines. The brief argues that this is a clear violation of free speech protections and an attempt to silence any dissenting medical opinions.
    • Informed Consent is Non-Negotiable – The ICAN brief makes it clear: Informed consent requires that patients receive all relevant medical information, including risks and benefits, without coercion. The OMB’s actions violate this principle by attempting to dictate what doctors can and cannot say about medical interventions​.
    • The Need for Supreme Court Intervention – If this precedent is allowed to stand, any doctor who challenges the pharmaceutical-driven narrative could face career-ending retaliation. The brief urges the U.S. Supreme Court to take up this case and ensure that medical boards cannot silence physicians simply for presenting science that challenges the status quo.

    ​​Why This Matters to You 

    This case is about more than just my ability to practice medicine—it’s about protecting the integrity of all medical professionals and ensuring that you, as patients, have access to truthful, comprehensive medical information. If doctors are afraid to speak out, patients lose their ability to make truly informed choices. No medical board should have the power to dictate what doctors can and cannot say when it comes to patient care. 
    The ICAN brief makes it clear: This case is about stopping government overreach before it becomes the norm. We cannot allow unelected bureaucrats to silence science, control the doctor-patient relationship, and strip away our fundamental rights to free speech and informed medical decision-making.

    Join Us in the Fight

    This battle isn’t just mine—it’s ours. The support I have received from ICAN and many other organizations is a testament to the growing movement to protect medical freedom. But we need your help to keep the momentum going.

    ​Read the full amicus brief below:

    ​Join us in supporting Dr. Paul’s fight for medical freedom and a chance to expose corruption in the medical board system. Share this post, spread the word, and stay tuned for more updates.
    #SupportDrPaul #MedicalFreedom #InformedConsent #DoctorFreeSpeech #ExposeTheCorruption @ICANdecide @paulthomasmd