The battle for medical freedom has reached a turning point. Across the nation, families are waking up to the reality that informed consent—a principle that should be the foundation of all healthcare decisions—is under threat.

That’s why the current lawsuit against the CDC is so important. This case challenges the agency’s long-standing refusal to properly test the cumulative impact of its ever-expanding childhood vaccine schedule. Families deserve answers, and they deserve transparency.

Sayer Ji’s critical coverage
In his recent article, We the People vs. the CDC: A Lawsuit That Could Change Everything, Sayer Ji of GreenMedInfo lays out the details of this historic legal action perfectly. He explains how this lawsuit is about more than data—it is about the constitutional right of parents to make informed decisions for their children’s health.

As Dr. Paul has often emphasized, this fight is not about being “pro” or “anti” anything. It is about ensuring that every family is given full transparency and the freedom to decide what is best for themselves and their children.

We encourage you to read Sayer Ji’s full article on Substack and share it widely. These issues affect every parent, every child, and every future generation.

#InformedConsent #MedicalFreedom #CDC #VaccineSafety #WeThePeople @greenmedinfo @doctorsandscience

On The HighWire, Del Bigtree welcomed Dr. Paul Thomas, MD—retired pediatrician and author—who continues to stand firm in the fight for medical freedom. Dr. Paul, who lost his medical license after publishing a pivotal vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study, is now taking his case to the next level: suing the CDC over the safety of its vaccine schedule. This powerful interview sheds light on the stakes for families, children, and the future of informed consent.

A new bill in California could put children directly in harm’s way. Del Bigtree sits down with Amy Bohn, Co-Founder & President of PERK, to expose the risks behind this dangerous legislation.

Then, investigative journalist Jefferey Jaxen reports on a new Illinois law mandating mental health checks for kids, raising alarming questions about privacy, safety, and state overreach.

Meanwhile, BlackRock’s Larry Fink ascends to co-chair the World Economic Forum, just as governments push even more extreme restrictions in the name of “climate change.”

Exposing the religion of SACRED SCIENCE today on The HighWire! ​

After my case against the Oregon Medical Board was not chosen to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court, I thought the legal road had ended. Then stepped in attorney Richard Jaffe, who is now using my case—along with that of Dr. Kenneth Stoller—to sue the CDC.

As Jaffe explains in his post, Finally: The CDC’s Untested Childhood Vaccine Schedule Is on Trial, “this case puts the CDC’s entire childhood program on trial. For decades, the agency has demanded proof of harm while refusing to do the studies that could provide it, and physicians who attempt to fill that research gap or challenge the schedule or ACIP’s narrow contraindications and precautions framework are ridiculed and delicensed. Meanwhile, American children have become the sickest in the developed world under the most aggressive vaccine schedule on earth. That era is over. They want to claim the program is safe? Fine. Prove it.”

Here is the actual legal filing: complaint2.pdf

To support this important legal action, please consider contributing here: GiveSendGo – Shared Decision-Making for Vaccine.

​This is about protecting parents’ right to choose what, if anything, is injected into or forced upon their children.

As a pediatrician who was board certified by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) for 30 years, and a member up until they stripped me of my board certification (based on the Oregon Medical Board emergently and wrongfully suspending my medical license), I have watched this organization abandon children every step of the way when it comes to vaccines and the harm caused by vaccines.

I remained a member for the past 20 years, so I would know what they were up to. Attending their conferences in the first 10 years of my career, I realized they were beholden to the formula industry and the vaccine industry in a big way. Their conferences were more about indoctrination than they were about good science.

Sadly, for the roughly 67,000 pediatricians who are members, I suspect most are completely unaware that this organization prioritizes money and support of their corporate donors over the health of children.

This year, they are doubling down on their allegiance to pharma and profits with their new policy statement supporting the removal of both philosophical and religious exemptions. They want only medical exemptions according to CDC guidelines, which in effect eliminates all exemptions, including medical, as no physician who wants to keep their license will write a medical exemption.

This AAP News report outlines the top 10 priorities for the AAP, with number one being “Eliminating Non-medical* Exemptions to Vaccinating Children.” They want parents to be sidelined and have no say in what gets injected into their children. The AAP is supporting a one-size-fits-all vaccine program that is known to cause massive harm. This harm is well documented in my recent book Vax Facts and by substantial research that is ignored by the AAP, the CDC, and pediatricians.

The smoking gun that explains why the AAP has abandoned parents and their children is clear when you look at where they get most of their money. The article by David Bell, The American Academy of Pediatrics: Mining Children for Profit, and the Substack post by Dr. Meryl Nass say it all. Just look at the top funders of the AAP, and we now know why they are aligned with pharma and vaccine companies, especially Moderna, Merck, Sanofi, GSK, Eli Lilly, and other pharmaceutical companies—all top donors! Follow the money, and now that we have it, it is time to consider letting our buying power do the talking.

Please read the original post here: The American Academy of Pediatrics Destroys Its Own Credibility

One way to do that is to refuse to see any pediatrician who is a member of the AAP. It is time to support pediatricians and providers who honor informed consent and take a stand against vaccine mandates and the AAP.

Our children are counting on us, the parents, to protect them from pharmaceutical predators who are aided by the AAP—and sadly, that means we must protect our children from most pediatricians.

Call the office and ask if they have providers who support families that don’t want to give any vaccines. Unless you get a clear, no-hesitation, “Yes, we absolutely support parents and their right to choose what, if any, vaccines are given,” then move on… NEXT.

I hear too often that there are no pediatricians who will allow families into their practice who don’t want to do all the vaccines, or even families that want to thoughtfully pick and choose. The COVID disaster did give us some blessings—you can now get care online. So, even if there is no practice near you that honors informed consent, there are plenty that do online.

SUMMARY
Thank you, AAP, for making yourselves completely irrelevant and dangerous. We hear you, and going forward we will not follow your guidelines or advice.

#AAP #VaccineSafety #MedicalCensorship #ParentingRights #InformedConsent #ChildHealth #IndependentScience @VaxFactsBook @KidsFirst4Ever

The recent article "A Rational Moment: Kennedy and Oz" by Popular Rationalism sparked a vital conversation about the systemic coercion embedded within our healthcare institutions, particularly when it comes to vaccines. While that post eloquently dissected the broader cultural and political implications of vaccine mandates, this article zooms in on how these coercive tactics have been quietly enforced in pediatric care through so-called “quality measures.” For over a decade, these policies have undermined informed consent, masking aggressive vaccination protocols under the guise of improving healthcare outcomes. It’s time to pull back the curtain on these hidden mechanisms and demand a return to patient-centered, outcome-focused medicine.

​These coercive tactics have been hidden as quality measures for over a decade now in pediatrics when it comes to vaccines.

All quality measures that assess compliance based on vaccination rates or prescribing habits must be eliminated. Quality measures need to focus on actual health outcomes—this is the path toward better medicine.

​The same scenario has unfolded in hospitals regarding the administration of the hepatitis B vaccine to newborns. Hospitals are considered “quality” or “baby-friendly” if they achieve high vaccination rates. Is it any wonder that most hospitals embed standing orders for the hepatitis B vaccine and the vitamin K shot in the admission documents parents sign upon entering the hospital to deliver their baby? Unknowingly, parents sign documents granting the hospital permission to administer these injections. Consequently, these interventions are often carried out within the first hour of life—before parents even realize what is happening.

​Imagine that! You are vaccinating your newborn against a sexually transmitted disease that is predominantly contracted through sexual activity with an infected person or through the sharing of contaminated needles used for intravenous drugs like heroin. Between 99% and 99.9% of mothers in the United States do NOT have hepatitis B, rendering the risk to their newborns virtually zero.

Worse still, a toxic dose of aluminum is administered through this vaccine, potentially triggering immune system chaos. The consequences can range from immune dysregulation to severe outcomes like death, autism, and the plethora of autoimmune and allergic conditions that plague today’s children.

It is time to eliminate all metrics that measure a healthcare provider's ability to follow rigid protocols. If we are to maintain quality measures in medicine, they must reflect meaningful health outcomes—reduced mortality, decreased illness, fewer chronic conditions, and minimized side effects. Importantly, these metrics should encompass all health outcomes; otherwise, the system will continue to manipulate data, selectively reporting outcomes that serve institutional agendas.

For further exploration of how these quality measures distort pediatric care, refer to Dr. Paul Thomas and DeeDee Hoover’s book VAX FACTS, which provides an in-depth examination of vaccine-related coercion and informed consent issues.

#InformedConsent #PediatricHealth #VaccineRisks #ParentsRights #MedicalFreedom #KidsFirst4Ever #VAXFACTS #DoctorsAndScience
@KidsFirst4Ever @DoctorsAndScience